Gynopedia needs your support! Please consider contributing content, translating a page, or making a donation today. With your support, we can sustain and expand the website. Gynopedia has no corporate sponsors or advertisers. Your support is crucial and deeply appreciated.
Talk:Taipei: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Understood, and it does make sense seeing as this wiki was started city-based. However, since both pages are '''exactly''' the same currently, it means double work for anyone contributing edits that apply to both pages. Maybe redirecting (not merging) Taiwan to Taipei makes more sense currently? Anyway, of course I respect your decision how the basic structure should be, and will thus simply copy/paste the edits I do to one to the other as well. Next step I'll check how things are organized for other countries vs. cities and start separating Taiwan and Taipei, as well as add some other major cities (Kaohsiung, ...) with local info based on existing resources like forumosa. Cheers from Taiwan, and thanks for the great idea and work creating and maintaining this wiki! A real contribution to society. [[User:CasualTaiwan|CasualTaiwan]] ([[User talk:CasualTaiwan|talk]]) | Understood, and it does make sense seeing as this wiki was started city-based. However, since both pages are '''exactly''' the same currently, it means double work for anyone contributing edits that apply to both pages. Maybe redirecting (not merging) Taiwan to Taipei makes more sense currently? Anyway, of course I respect your decision how the basic structure should be, and will thus simply copy/paste the edits I do to one to the other as well. Next step I'll check how things are organized for other countries vs. cities and start separating Taiwan and Taipei, as well as add some other major cities (Kaohsiung, ...) with local info based on existing resources like forumosa. Cheers from Taiwan, and thanks for the great idea and work creating and maintaining this wiki! A real contribution to society. [[User:CasualTaiwan|CasualTaiwan]] ([[User talk:CasualTaiwan|talk]]) | ||
Yes, all great points! Thanks for your work on the wiki & support; it's really appreciated! Okay, so thoughts: I've wrestled with the fact that we have nearly duplicate information on both pages -- and, in some cases, like Taiwan/Taipei, the exact same information. The way this happens is that, usually, the city page is created first (and, when the wiki was started, it was only city pages). Then, after the city page is complete, the information is used to create the corresponding country page. | Yes, all great points! Thanks for your work on the wiki & support; it's really appreciated! Okay, so thoughts: I've wrestled with the fact that we have nearly duplicate information on both pages -- and, in some cases, like Taiwan/Taipei, the exact same information. The way this happens is that, usually, the city page is created first (and, when the wiki was started, it was only city pages). Then, after the city page is complete, the information is used to create the corresponding country page. The hope is that, over time, the country pages can discuss things like regional variations (in things like laws, social stigmas, costs, etc). Currently, not all city/country pages are identical -- but they're almost identical. The main difference is that the country pages sometimes don't include specific recommendations for things like hospitals, clinics, pharmacies, ob/gyns (which I think is the right approach). Instead, in the case of the Canada page, for example, they may say something like, "For information on STI testing facilities in Canada, please visit the city pages, like the Toronto page, as recommendations will vary by city." The reason why the Taiwan page doesn't have this distinction is because this extra step (i.e. removing city-specific recommendations) wasn't taken when the Taiwan page was created. However, this is (I think) a flawed approach anyway. As you can see, it's very difficult to ensure that edits from one page are displayed on edits from another page. Meanwhile, even if the same edits are placed on both city and country pages, we still have the issue of redundancy of content. Overall, I would like to find a better solution. Now regarding potential ideas/solutions: I really like that you bring up redirection vs. merger. Perhaps we can redirect country pages to city pages IF there's only one city page for that country (and, therefore, no major difference in content between the two pages). And perhaps Gynopedia can use a slightly different template (content-wise) for the country pages, so users are encouraged to think about country pages differently. I'm curious to know your thoughts! Of course please feel free to take your time to explore the site and see what you think, but I'm looking forward to knowing what you think! Thanks :) [[User:Lani314|Lani314]] ([[User talk:Lani314|talk]]) | ||
Revision as of 07:21, 4 October 2017
There seems to be no difference in the content of the Taiwan and Taipei pages. I would suggest to merge them, instead of having to do all edits in two places. Or to separate Taiwan general information and Taipei specific things.
Hey there - The reason why the Taipei and Taiwan pages seem very similar is because we only have information up for one Taiwanese city so far (Taipei). Once we have information for more Taiwanese cities, the Taiwan page will become more robust. Also, it should be noted that city pages may have some information (like specific pharmacy, clinic or ob/gyn recommendations) that aren't found on country pages. We don't want to discourage people from adding city-specific information by removing city pages entirely. For this reason, we can't merge these pages. I've rolled back the merge. I understand why you may have thought it was a good idea, but please do contact Gynopedia (gynopediawiki@gmail.com) before merging pages in the future. Thanks so much for your thoughts/ideas too! - Lani Lani314 (talk)
Understood, and it does make sense seeing as this wiki was started city-based. However, since both pages are exactly the same currently, it means double work for anyone contributing edits that apply to both pages. Maybe redirecting (not merging) Taiwan to Taipei makes more sense currently? Anyway, of course I respect your decision how the basic structure should be, and will thus simply copy/paste the edits I do to one to the other as well. Next step I'll check how things are organized for other countries vs. cities and start separating Taiwan and Taipei, as well as add some other major cities (Kaohsiung, ...) with local info based on existing resources like forumosa. Cheers from Taiwan, and thanks for the great idea and work creating and maintaining this wiki! A real contribution to society. CasualTaiwan (talk)
Yes, all great points! Thanks for your work on the wiki & support; it's really appreciated! Okay, so thoughts: I've wrestled with the fact that we have nearly duplicate information on both pages -- and, in some cases, like Taiwan/Taipei, the exact same information. The way this happens is that, usually, the city page is created first (and, when the wiki was started, it was only city pages). Then, after the city page is complete, the information is used to create the corresponding country page. The hope is that, over time, the country pages can discuss things like regional variations (in things like laws, social stigmas, costs, etc). Currently, not all city/country pages are identical -- but they're almost identical. The main difference is that the country pages sometimes don't include specific recommendations for things like hospitals, clinics, pharmacies, ob/gyns (which I think is the right approach). Instead, in the case of the Canada page, for example, they may say something like, "For information on STI testing facilities in Canada, please visit the city pages, like the Toronto page, as recommendations will vary by city." The reason why the Taiwan page doesn't have this distinction is because this extra step (i.e. removing city-specific recommendations) wasn't taken when the Taiwan page was created. However, this is (I think) a flawed approach anyway. As you can see, it's very difficult to ensure that edits from one page are displayed on edits from another page. Meanwhile, even if the same edits are placed on both city and country pages, we still have the issue of redundancy of content. Overall, I would like to find a better solution. Now regarding potential ideas/solutions: I really like that you bring up redirection vs. merger. Perhaps we can redirect country pages to city pages IF there's only one city page for that country (and, therefore, no major difference in content between the two pages). And perhaps Gynopedia can use a slightly different template (content-wise) for the country pages, so users are encouraged to think about country pages differently. I'm curious to know your thoughts! Of course please feel free to take your time to explore the site and see what you think, but I'm looking forward to knowing what you think! Thanks :) Lani314 (talk)