Gynopedia needs your support! Please consider contributing content, translating a page, or making a donation today. With your support, we can sustain and expand the website. Gynopedia has no corporate sponsors or advertisers. Your support is crucial and deeply appreciated.

User:CasualTaiwan/Sec: Difference between revisions

From Gynopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>
Taken from: https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=User:Sanbeg/Sec
This template is intended as a proof of concept, to demonstrate transcluding sections of articles.   
This template is intended as a proof of concept, to demonstrate transcluding sections of articles.   



Latest revision as of 17:49, 4 October 2017


Taken from: https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=User:Sanbeg/Sec

This template is intended as a proof of concept, to demonstrate transcluding sections of articles.

To transclude larger sections, it may be more useful to split the section into a daughter page, or some other seperate page/template, then transcluding that where necessary. If you always transclude the same section, i.e. to transclude the body of text without extra boilerplate, then it should be simple to use <onlyinclude>.

However, when there are many smaller sections, it's simpler to mark the sections, and call them by name. For example, if you have a a large article with small numbered sections, marked like


 This is a sample article, with a few sections
 <onlyinclude>{{{sec1|This is the first section}}}</onlyinclude>
 <onlyinclude>{{{sec2|This is the second section}}}</onlyinclude>

Then, you could transclude section 1 with

 {{User:CasualTaiwan/Sec|Article|1}}


All text between <onlyinclude> and </onlyinclude> should be marked with a section (or marked somehow) to prevent unconditional transclusion. Of course, it's possible to have multiple <onlyinclude> blocks.